Thursday, January 28, 2016

A Breath of Hope

   The beginning of the passage starts with a breath of hope in a hopeless world. The Man and the Boy discover a left over bunker, the bunker is full of rations and supplies. They spend days simply lazing around and eating. For once the two characters seem at peace and somewhat enjoy themselves. The boy is actually confused as to what is happening, he is not used to being able to sleep in, play checkers, or eat three meals a day. The Man simply enjoys watching the boy at peace, he bathes him, cuts his hair, and cooks for him. However, the Man knows they have to move on, the bunker is to dangerous, to good to keep. He knows at any time they could be discovered and killed and therefore his happiness is brief and brings sadness with it, a hurtful reminder of how good life was and could have been.
   They eventually leave the bunker clean and well fed and immediately the road begins to wear them down. The author again utilizes his ability to create a random and constant flow of events with immaculate description. The two stumble on an old man that feels more like a hallucination than anything. He is described as a pile of rags, filthy, and tiny. He is small and his dialogue is short any riddle like, answering many questions from the Man with questions of his own. He is a wanderer and is neither good nor bad, and therefore doesn't affect the Man and Boy greatly. However, it is an interesting as well as unlike the duo has experienced before. The wandering old man could serve as an image for the old world, still there but ruined and dying. Like the old world the old man is still trying to hold on, but has no real substance in the new and desolate world.
  As the rest of the passage continues the small breath of hope in the beginning of the reading begins to escape. The Man and Boy cross paths with a number of groups, all desperate, filthy, and trying to survive. The packs appearances create many short and stressful situations forcing the Man and Boy to stash their rations, and spend sleepless nights. In addition to them being on the run often the man is hit with a fever. Waves of diarrhea, cold sweats, coughs, and exhaustion crash on the man, making his already strenuous journey that much more difficult. The fever risks taking him away from his son and abandoning him in a unforgiving world. While the man overcomes the fever, the passage ends with a true sense of depravity and hopelessness.
   The Man and Boy notice a small group following and hide, waiting for them to pass he witnesses the groups members. Three gaunt men and a very pregnant woman. They wait and the group wanders down the road out of sight. The duo presses on and they notice a fire in the distance, they decide to investigate, and again there is a small amount of hope ingrained in their curiosity. What if the group is decent, holding onto the old ways, the "good guys"? The two stumble upon an abandoned fire and discover the charred and headless corpse of a newborn infant. While the author may be trying to create a ghastly and evil passage to make the reader rear back, I think he is showing how bad things are. Not that people are evil now, but the level they have stooped to in order to survive. It is a truly sad and heartbreaking passage in the book and makes what was a bittersweet beginning into a sad and deprived ending.
 



5 comments:

  1. Good discussion of the shift in tone in this section of the book. Do you agree that they really did have to leave the bunker, as it's never really clear what they are headed toward. Certainly they hope things will be better at the coast, but do they have any assurances of such?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The entire book breaths a lack of assurance. That is where holding onto hope come in. Whether or not holding onto hope is stupid at this point remain for discussion. But I think the hope of seeing what is could possibly lie at the coast outweighed the possible dangers of staying in the bunker.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What is it about this novel that makes it a captivating read for you? The idea of an apocalypse isn't terribly original. Does it change the way you view anything in your own life? Does it provoke independent thinking? Or is it just the way it's written, with the author's tone and description?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Ged, I like your point about how people in the book aren't necessarily evil, they are just going farther to survive. I also feel like the dead infant is an example of McCarthy's dark style, because there's all that hope in there, and things seem to be getting better for the characters, and then there's still that reminder of how bad things are. Thoughts on the ending of the book? I liked it, because I wasn't quite sure how they were going to wrap things up. What did you think?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The whole idea of hope is kinda one of teasing in this novel wouldn't you think? The man and the boy have hope for the coast, which was essentially misplaced. The people in the basement (livestock as we referred to them earlier) may have been given a breath of hope, prior to coming to the realization that the boy and the man were not there to help them. And the hope of survival from the new world was dangled in the man's face as he avoided human conflict time and time again only to fall victim to natural causes. It seems as though this book tends to tease the reader and the characters with this idea of hope which turns out to consistently fail, yet the boy remains hopeful... Why??

    ReplyDelete